Nuria Pistón and colleagues recently had their paper on functional traits and fitness published in Journal of Ecology. Nuria tells us more about the study below.
Trait-based approaches are extensively used in ecology to examine species interactions and species response to environmental change. However, although the link between traits and fitness is essential for the definition of functional traits, evidence linking traits and fitness proxies remains scarce and generally weak. Does this mean that traits do not influence fitness? Not necessarily. Rather, we think that we are not looking at this problem in the best possible way.
In our paper we tested whether considering multiple traits that represent different ecological strategies can help us to uncover the relationship between traits and demographic components underlying fitness. This also allowed us to examine the existence of a single optimum (i.e. a single peak with maximum performance in the fitness landscape) vs. alternative designs (i.e. more than one peaks). Despite the great variability in plant forms that is usually observed in natural communities, the exploration of alternative designs and whether they could improve the predictability of trait-fitness relationships within an environment has not been tapped. This is not surprising, since this very task is challenging, requiring both functional trait and demographic data from the same species/sites under variable environmental conditions, and a robust methodological approach to account for multiple trait interactions. Here, we used boosted regression trees (BRT) to test hypotheses on trait combinations compared to standard linear models. We used two published datasets for comparisons: i) an observational dataset with five traits, and elasticities of three vital rates (survival, growth, and reproduction) of 222 plant species worldwide (Adler et al., 2014), and ii) a botanical garden dataset with 11 traits and, spontaneous seed and vegetative reproduction of 951 plant species from the collection of native plants of central European Flora (Herben et al., 2012).
Using the observational datasets, we found that BRTs outperform linear models in predicting the role of traits, and their interactions, on the relative importance of survival, growth, and reproduction for population growth rate (Fig 1). In order to make a fair comparison between methods we needed to remove species for which we were lacking information for the considered traits. This is because linear models fully disregard observations when there are missing values for any of the predictors, while BRTs can deal with missing values, which are so frequent in trait information. Therefore, if we hadn’t had to remove species, the remarkable increases in predictive ability when using BRTs would likely even have been bigger than we show. Another important advantage of BRTs is their ability to automatically fit interactions between predictors as well as non-linear responses in a way that cannot be achieved with linear models.
Using the botanical garden dataset, we found that traits shape fitness through their interactive effects. For instance, in 83% of the cases, the values of vegetative reproduction were better explained by models including interactions among traits than with models without interactions (Fig 2). Our results highlight the crucial importance of considering interactions among traits that depict different ecological dimensions to reliably assess trait-by-environment effects on fitness.
While traits interact in complex ways, resulting in different combinations of traits that can yield equivalent fitness values, we only found alternative designs in one (meadow) of the six habitats we evaluated from the botanical garden dataset (Herben et al., 2012). Both high and low SLA values combined with high lateral spread resulted in similarly high vegetative reproduction (Fig 3). As SLA is a proxy of individual growth rate, our findings suggest that both slow and fast-growing clonal plants that are able to spread further away from the ramets are successful in the meadow habitat.
Our study demonstrates that including complex trait interactions is necessary to adequately quantify the multiple dimensions of plant traits and how these shape their fitness. The analysis of trait combinations, and corresponding alternative designs via BRTs represent a promising approach for understanding and managing functional changes in vegetation composition through measurement of suites of relatively easily measurable traits.
Nuria Pistón, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ, Brazil