‌The hidden fungal world: How tree species with different abundance shape rhizosphere symbioses‌

Jiarong Yang and Yu Liu, East China Normal University, discuss their article: Rare tree species host a high diversity of rhizosphere fungi

Forest ecosystems are intricate webs of life where trees and their root-associated fungi form a delicate balance. One question that remains, is whether and how tree species abundance influences the fungal communities that live in their rhizosphere. If abundance indeed alters these fungal communities, our second question follows: do abundance-associated differences in rhizosphere fungal diversity help explain variation in seedling biomass? Our research group worked to shed light on this mystery, revealing a fascinating link between tree rarity and fungal diversity.

The canopy of the Baishanzu 25-ha subtropical forest plot. Photo by Dong Dai.

The relationship between tree species abundance and total rhizosphere fungal richness from field sampling in the Baishanzu forest plot. Rare tree species, those with less than 25 individuals with DBH greater than 1 cm across the entire plot, are depicted as filled triangles, whereas all other species are depicted as filled circles.

‌Unravelling the tree – fungus relationship‌

We sampled rhizosphere soils from 272 adult trees across 68 species in a 25-ha subtropical forest plot in Baishanzu in eastern China to examine the relationship between host tree species abundance and rhizosphere fungal diversity. Detection of a negative relationship would imply a reduced selection effect of rare tree species on soil fungi. As expected, we found that ‌total rhizosphere fungal diversity declined with increasing tree species abundance‌. In other words, rare tree species exerted weaker selection on associated soil fungi, thus hosting a richer rhizosphere fungal community than common species.

Boxplot illustrating the total rhizosphere fungal richness for the five test tree species in the greenhouse experiment. Different lowercase letters denote significant pairwise differences between tree species based on Tukey‐adjusted contrasts of estimated marginal means derived from the GLMM that incorporated treatment as a random effect. The five test species are Callicarpa membranacea (CM), Acer davidii (AD), Symplocos paniculata (SP), Photinia beauverdiana (PB), and Schima superba (SS). The least abundant species (CM) is represented in red.

To further confirm this observation, we conducted a greenhouse experiment. We selected seedlings of five tree species with contrasting abundance and phylogenetic relatedness from the Baishanzu 25-ha plot. These seedlings were planted in pots filled with the same heterospecific soil mixture, which standardized both the soil fungal inoculum background and the abiotic soil environment. The use of heterospecific soil inoculum was intended to reduce potential biases caused by host-related microbial selection, particularly among closely related tree species (e.g., the same genus). The results mirrored the field data: the least abundant species, Callicarpa membranacea, had the weakest host selection effect, hosting the highest fungal richness.

Interestingly, only with Callicarpa membranacea seedlings did we observe that total rhizosphere fungal diversity was ‌positively correlated‌ with both aboveground biomass and the ratio between above- and belowground biomass. This suggests that a rich fungal community may help sustain this rare tree species in the wild.

Results of linear models showing the relationships between total rhizosphere fungal richness and seedling biomass (aboveground and root), as well as the ratio between above- and belowground biomass in the greenhouse experiment. (a) aboveground biomass; (b) root biomass; (c) biomass allocation ratio (aboveground biomass/root biomass). Prior to conducting the models for (a and b), seedling biomass (its unit in grams) of the five test tree species was transformed to z-scores separately for each species. The solid line represents a statistically significant effect (p < 0.05), while the dashed line represents an effect that is not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Fungal specialization patterns‌

Using Blüthgen’s weighted specialization index d′, we classified fungi as low (0–0.33), moderate (0.34–0.67), and high (0.68–1.0) specialization. The experiment further revealed that tree species with varying abundance in the surveyed site differed in their fungal selection preferences. In particular, C. membranacea (rare) hosted more ‌moderate-specialization fungi‌, which may associate with a broader range of hosts, as suggested by their similar proportions in both the least and most abundant species. In contrast, Schima superba (abundant) hosted the highest proportion of ‌high-specialization fungi‌, suggesting that high host abundance may increase fungal encounter rates and thereby alleviate dispersal limitation for specialist fungi.

Why this matters: Implications for forest ecology

This study demonstrates that ‌rare tree species harbour higher fungal diversity‌ in their rhizospheres than common ones, reflecting their weaker selection on soil fungi.

For forest conservation, these findings highlight the importance of preserving not just trees but also their microbial partners, for example by mitigating excessive anthropogenic disturbance. The weaker selection effect of rare tree species likely allows more fungal taxa to persist in the rhizosphere, resulting in higher total rhizosphere fungal diversity. This may confer an advantage if diverse fungal communities provide complementary functions (e.g., nutrient acquisition, pathogen suppression) that enhance host fitness. A diverse fungal community may thus help maintain the stability of rare tree populations, ultimately shaping the composition of entire ecosystems.

Conclusion

The next time you walk through a forest, remember that the trees you see are not just solitary organisms. They instead are part of a vast, hidden network of fungi that can shape tree growth, health, and survival. Understanding this relationship could be crucial for protecting our planet’s biodiversity.

Leave a comment